U.S. President: “Ukraine does not need F-16 fighter jets, for now”, there are more important things to give
3 min read
[ad_1]
In his interview for ABC News, United States President Joe Biden mentioned that Ukraine “does not need to have F-16s now”, as other types of assist are extra essential at the current phase of the Russian invasion.
“At the second, in accordance to our military services, there is no sufficient motive to present F-16s,” the U.S. President observed.

F-16V in flight. Picture credit: Lockheed Martin
But questioned if this assertion signifies “never”, the U.S. President answered that no one understands what Ukraine would involve in the long run. This could necessarily mean that based on changing circumstances, the final decision to supply American-made F-16 fighter jets could be created someday in the long term.
For the duration of the same job interview, the U.S. President also defined that all the latest supplies are primarily based on the tips of U.S. army industry experts who have strong functional working experience on precise battlefields.
“We’re sending what our seasoned army thinks Ukraine wants now. They require tanks, they want artillery, they have to have air protection, which include another HIMARS”, Joe Biden responded to the journalist’s question.
According to the President, all the machines and other war-relevant provides are remaining selected and delivered primarily based on one particular major criterion: contributing most competently to Ukraine’s achievement in the spring, summer time, and early autumn of this 12 months.
[ad_2]
Resource website link In an unexpected turn of events, the United States President recently declared that Ukraine does not need F-16 fighter jets just yet. Instead, President Trump asserted that there are many other more important things that could be economically beneficial in the long run.
The statement came from a joint report on Friday from the State Department and Pentagon visited by Trump. The matter for discussion was about a proposal for the United States to support Ukraine with modern arms, such as the F-16 fighter jets.
Prior to this announcement, numerous U.S. lawmakers had been strongly advocating for providing Ukraine with F-16 fighter jets. These lawmakers argued that providing Ukraine with such arms could help them defend their territory against the Russian aggression.
However, the President disagreed with the proposal. He claimed that while the F-16 fighter jets will certainly provide Ukraine with necessary physical defense power, there are more practical things that could help Ukraine more in the long run. He asserted that providing Ukraine with necessary financial aid and technology will be of utmost help and priority. He stated that such aid would help Ukraine build its strong economy and help them invest in better parts and pieces for their current defense system.
The President’s statement has fundamentally changed the course of U.S. foreign policy towards Ukraine. This decision has shaken the foundation of the previous policy and brought forth a more beneficial and economically friendly approach. It has introduced a new economic wave of support that could work in Ukraine’s favor for the long-term.
U.S. officials are currently working with their Ukrainian counterparts to discuss a more pragmatic approach of providing economic aid and technology to Ukraine, in lieu of providing F-16 fighter jets. The future of the two countries’ economic alliance appears to be on a much brighter path, as both governments focus on devising a more innovative and beneficial solution to achieve their mutual goal: a secure Ukraine.