April 19, 2024

Su-75: Russia trying to sell non-existing fighter jet?

3 min read


The Su-75 “Checkmate” was shown in the summer season of 2022, but until finally now the builders of this challenge attempted to keep the relevant data out of public get to.

This is a mock-up airframe of the Su-75 fighter jet, along with its armaments displayed during a military exhibition.

This is a mock-up airframe of the Su-75 fighter jet, along with its armaments exhibited through a military services exhibition. Graphic credit: Mztourist via Wikimedia, CC BY-SA 4.

Apparently, the Kremlin is attempting to deepen armed forces cooperation with India. This nation stays the principal buyer of Russian weapons.

Even with the imposed sanctions owing to its invasion of Ukraine, the Russian Federation continues to supply India with weapons, specially the S-400. Numerous joint initiatives are also underway, like the growth of the Brahmos anti-ship missile or the output of AK-203 assault rifles.

Now the Russian Federation will try to open a new webpage in the cooperation between the two nations around the world: the “fifth generation” light-weight fighter jet Su-75 code name “Checkmate”.

The design of this aircraft was launched again in the summer season of 2021 and because then virtually very little has been listened to about it. However, just lately Russian media discovered that the Kremlin would attempt providing Delhi “to add to the gentle tactical fighter project”.

Delhi has some former knowledge doing the job with the Russian Federation. India stopped collaborating in the joint FGFA (fifth generation fighter jet) undertaking in 2018. This task was introduced back again in 2007 and was intended to be dependent on the advancement of a different fighter jet, Su-57.

Through the implementation of this past FGFA job, the notion of an Indian fighter was produced at a charge of 295 million pounds, just after which the system started to stall. As the Russians by themselves say – “due to disagreements amongst the parties”, and according to unofficial details from the other aspect – owing to delays in the output of Su-57.

In addition, India is presently producing its fifth-era HAL AMCA fighter in cooperation with Western businesses, so there is tiny opportunity this nation could be intrigued in vague potential clients of the Su-75 undertaking, specially following the United Arab Emirates suspended their involvement in this particular task.


Supply connection In a shocking twist to the international arms-trade narrative, reports have emerged that Russia is attempting to sell a fighter jet, the Su-75, that may not actually exist. This most unusual situation began to unravel when officials in Azerbaijan, a former Soviet state in the southern Caucasus, noticed something strange in their contracts.

The Su-75 was supposedly a fifth-generation aircraft being sold at a surprisingly low cost, prompting the officials to ask for clarification from Moscow. Instead of answering the query with details about the fighter jet, the response from Russia was perplexing – it completely denied the existence of the Su-75.

The chain of events has since been confirmed by sources from both the Russian and Azerbaijani defense establishments, but no official has offered an explanation for the attempt to deceive. It is possible the jet was supposed to be a modified version of the Russian Su-35, and the ruse was meant to hide the aircraft’s true identity. It is also possible that this was a botched attempt to sell a prototype not yet ready for production, or an adjusted version of the Su-27.

The implications of the story involve not only Russia and Azerbaijan, but every country engaging in international arms deals. Such an occurrence shakes the faith held in states as they negotiate agreements, and raises questions about the ethics of those involved. There is of course no legal consequence for the attempted deception, and Russia has declined to comment on the situation, opting to stay silent rather than explain their actions.

It appears the truth of the situation will never be known, instead leaving us to ponder why a major player in the international arms trade would attempt to deceive a country to which it is supposedly friendly.